Garland Witness HUMILIATES Herself With RIDICULOUS 'SpaceX Case'… Watch Jim Jordan LAUGHS At Her

Garland Witness HUMILIATES Herself With RIDICULOUS ‘SpaceX Case’… Watch Jim Jordan LAUGHS At Her
Miss Clark uh in the Biden versus uh excuse me the Missouri versus Biden case uh in the district court the court explained quote if the allegations made by the plaintiffs are true the present case arguably involves the most massive attack on Free Speech in United States history close quote Court went on to

Find that the plaintiffs were reasonably likely to succeed on the merits at trial entered a preliminary injunction the fifth circuit has affirmed Supreme Court is taken jurisdiction of the case of course that’s all civil litigation is any criminal investigation or prosecution of the persons responsible

For that activity in the FBI sisa and at the White House and their co-conspirators underway in the Civil Rights division um Congressman I’m I’m not uh familiar with this litigation but happy to bring your question back thank you so let me just make sure I understand that

You are not aware of the Missouri versus Biden litigation that is currently being taken up by the United States Supreme Court is that correct uh unfortunately I’m I’m not Congressman well assuming not uh assuming that you’re not aware of that um what what reason would there be that

The Civil Rights division of the Justice Department’s leader is unaware of what a United States district court has described as the most massive attack on Free Speech in the United States history um if if if you could share more of the facts uh that could be helpful congressmen otherwise you’re just you

Just don’t know is that correct that that’s correct unfortunately I’m this does not appear to be a case that I’m familiar with good enough I’m going to yield the amance of my time to the chairman this gentleman go ahead okay so I find that to be

Astounding I do want to follow up on the line of question the gentleman from California uh with respect to the face act implementation because M Miss Clark you you dismissed saying well I can’t who’s whose time are we doing now go ahead Mr it’s my time I I’ll let the

Gentl I may ask S send to the gentleman from Ohio after you but I just wanted to point out that there have been at least 35 cases of the pH Act being applied to pro-life groups Andor churches uh or you know pro-life people that are anti-abortion in your tenure not even

Counting 2021 that’s the data from 2022 and 2023 versus the four that we can point to the one that you point to in January so the appoint gentleman from California I would just ask you you’re you’re in your possession of your hands you had a foyer request that was

Responded to um from a left leaning group uh the center for investigative reporting we’ve been asking for a copy of that foyer about the prosecution levels and the numbers from your office uh for a long time I think for almost a year and we’ve not been responded to so

Will you commit to sharing that foyer request and all of the data of face act prosecutions specifically under your watch and generally I I can absolutely bring this back to the divisions Foya officials and ensure that you receive a timely response um please know that the division is committed to evenhanded

Enforcement of the even even under your watch it’s at least 35 to one or two that is not evenhanded that’s far from evenhanded and importantly Mark Hal who was targeted had a raid of his home prosecuted under this was acquitted by a jury have you apologized to him on

Behalf of the Department of Justice for that grave violation of his civil rights having his family have to watch him being raided at his home and then he’s acquitted by a federal jury have you apologized to him well we we follow the facts and apply the law that is our our

Job and we welcome opportunities to engage with other pro-life groups that may be experiencing threats or act the answer to that is is no iscla my time I yield to the gentleman from Ohio chairman I thinkk the general for yielding I’m I’m like I think every

Member at least on this side but I would think every member anyone watching it just astounded that you are not familiar the Assistant Attorney General for the division of civil rights at the justice department is not familiar with a huge case Missouri B Biden where in that case

I think it was six different federal agencies were found to be guilty of violating the First Amendment Liberties of Americans HHS niad FBI doj DHS even the White House itself and you’re are not familiar with that is truly I I frankly I don’t know what I think that’s why the gentleman had time

To yield back because he didn’t know what I I don’t know what we say that that is UN it’s it’s in front of the Supreme Court and the head of civil rights division doesn’t know is is that is scary if that doesn’t in and of itself show that this justice department

Is political and doing things for political reasons I do not know what does I yield back and I appreciate the gentleman’s question you my time I think gentleman from North Carolina and gentl from Ohio um the Gent lady from Vermont is now recognized thank you Mr chairing that when anyone for whatever

Reason provides um takes takes action against someone who is providing reproductive Health Care thank you I yield back than gent lady from Pennsylvania recognize gentleman from California Mr Kylie I yield to the chair Mr Kylie the chair of the Judiciary Committee oh to the chair of the Judiciary Committee

Thanks Mr kyin thank the gentleman for uh yielding uh Miss uh Miss Clark who’s Ava edel um chairman that that is not a name that I’m familiar with well I’ll I’ll try to familiarize you with her she is an 87-year-old pro-life Advocate who survived a communist concentration camp in Yugoslavia after

World War II that you guys have charged under the face act for praying and singing in front of an abortion clinic is that the best use of the Justice Department’s time and energy um a as noted the face act has been uh is a law that this body passed

In response to efforts to obstruct access to uh reproductive health clinics threats of violence acts of violence we follow the facts and and apply the law without fear or or favor chairman really I think we’ve heard a lot of that today about how if you’re pro-life you get you

Get the full treatment just ask Ava edel 87y old concentration camp Survivor but if you’re on the other side after the do’s decision oh it’s a different different uh different issue uh in spite of what you’ve said that you apply it equally across uh across the board um

How about um your decision to file a lawsuit against SpaceX can you talk to me about that uh yes uh chairman let me ask it this way first did Elon mus purchase of Twitter have anything to do with the Justice Department’s decision to file that lawsuit against SpaceX the uh investigation into SpaceX

Was open during the last Administration and we filed an administrative action under the immigration and nationality act an important law passed by this body with bipartisan support and signed into law by President Reagan what what are you alleging that that SpaceX did wrong uh in this case we alleged that the company

Is not compliant with the anti-discrimination provisions of the immigration and nationality act this is a law that has been who they discriminating against uh here they are discriminating against um people who have re received Refugee and Asylum status by our federal courts under the refugee they’re discriminating against

Refugees and Asylum Seekers is that right uh uh no chairman uh against people who have received Refugee status and Asylum status by our federal courts and who enjoy equal standing under federal law uh to US citizens and and naturalized citizens the law requires equal treatment of these individuals it

Is saying that SpaceX did not hire is that is that appropriate did not hire enough refugees or uh people who’ve been granted Asylum uh is that what you’re asserting in the lawsuit uh and that they discourage those people from applying for any job whether it’s for a custodial uh position office clerk uh

Someone who works in a kitchen facility all the way up through Engineers you’re suing I just want to cut to the chase you’re suing SpaceX because they hired too many Americans too many citizens um this not enough people who are refugees or people who’ve been granted Asylum this investigation

You waited to this investigation started three years ago I know the fact started three years ago and yet you bring the lawsuit after Mr musk purchases Twitter now X is that right uh we apply the laws that this body gave us without fear or favor and and and Mr uh musk his

Assertion is that they’re dealing with National Security type information at SpaceX and that’s why he’s even posted this before you brought the lawsuit he said this that’s why they focus on hiring people who have a green card or are American citizens and you guys say

This is something we we need to go after SpaceX because they’re not hiring enough Americans and we need to charge Ava edel 87y old concentration camp Survivor that’s what the justice department and the Biden Administration needs to do but oh by the way we don’t know anything about Missouri V Biden we

Didn’t weigh in on the issue where a governor of a state told the citizens they’re American citizens you cannot exercise your second amendment rights contrary to the law contrary to what the Supreme Court has said and you trying to tell us today that the Civil Rights division the justice department is not

Political frankly I I find it almost laughable that you’re making that argument because anyone with common sense and any objectivity can see you guys are definitely political that I yeld back and thank you the gentleman who’s left for yielding time well I thank the Judiciary Committee chairman

Um I would like to uh ask Jam’s consent to insert into the record a letter uh from a uh Mr Paul teller the executive director of advancing American freedom to attorney general Garland secretary Cardona uh that is noting the significant spike in uh anti-semitic vandalism harassment and violence across

The United States uh and asking the Department of Justice Department education who have expansive jurisdiction particularly civil rights division uh over these matters to uh ensure that they’re p u you know following up on that signed by numerous groups across the country without objection be entered in the record now

Recognize the gentle lady from Wyoming Miss Hackman thank you Mr chair Assistant Attorney General Clark on October 12th the doj and cfpb issued a joint statement on Fair lending and credit opportunities for non-citizen borrowers under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act I sent a letter on this joint statement on November 6th but have

Yet to receive a response as you know the Civil Rights division enforces the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and you are quoted in the press release issued for this guidance which warns Banks not to use immigration status including whether an individual is is lawfully present in the country to determine the ability to

Take out a loan yet The Joint statement admits the Equal Credit Opportunity Act does not expressly prohibit consideration of immigration status this appears to be an attempt to dissuade our financial institutions from considering all legally permitted factors To Foree Fore fore spee fore Fore

KAYNAK